And many do. Are you suggesting otherwise? But I don't think they "should" do so if they're calling out legitimately poor behavior that has been unaddressed b

And many do. Are you suggesting otherwise? But I don't think they "should" do so if they're calling out legitimately poor behavior that has been unaddressed by any other avenue. That wording is quite strange to me. Would you say that Rosa Parks "should" have faced the consequences of stirring things up as she did? Accepting that it is possible is a necessary part of civil disobedience, but the imposition of those consequences by higher powers is not.