I’m getting downvoted for pursuing this line of questioning, but... yes? I really don’t see why this is controversial. Let’s ignore edge cases. You’re a single

I’m getting downvoted for pursuing this line of questioning, but... yes? I really don’t see why this is controversial. Let’s ignore edge cases. You’re a single dude. You’re used to living in a house. Suddenly your local environment is too expensive to live in a house with your current levels of employability. Option 1 is to live on the streets with your current job. Given the derivative of the economy you will not be able to afford housing in the near future. Option 2 is to move and seek a similar low paying job in an area with lower cost of living. Try to find a job, to acquire food and shelter. Option 2 feels to me like it could be much safer. Both require living on the streets, but the second one provides a path to not doing that. I get that both are unpleasant. But why not?