3 ms·
I don't think I'd use it even if Redis was a bottleneck [1]. With a performance increase of around 11% for SET/GET commands, I don't think there's that much to
by fredoliveira 16y ago
I don't think I'd use it even if Redis was a bottleneck [1]. With a performance increase of around 11% for SET/GET commands, I don't think there's that much to gain from running redis without an underlying OS. There's quite a bit to lose, too, because if you think about it, the implications here are that you aren't going to (ever) be able to make your data persist. Redis is a better fit for data that doesn't necessarily require persistence anyway, but putting this all on a scale, 11% don't win me over.
That being said (which is specifically about Redis on Xen), though, I think being able to run other server software without an underlying OS is pretty damn neat.
[1] Redis already scales nicely and with the upcoming Redis Cluster it's going to be trivial to run a fault-tolerant scaleable environment.
- jfb 16y agoWell, my assumption is that they think they can get better than 10-13% speedups; but even still. I just like the idea and the hackery.
- chunkbot 16y agoI'm skeptical when anyone says a upcoming product is going to make running a fault-tolerant scalable environment "trivial".
- fredoliveira 16y agoYou're right - bad choice of words. I can only hope that salvatore's implementation does make it trivial. I have spoken to him about it and seen him present about it and do feel confident at this point. It's obviously a little soon to say it'll make it trivial - I like the thinking behind it, that is all.