3 ms·
There are further implications. For example, since WWII, there have been huge efforts to identify and locate war criminals. So now, where there's DNA evidence,
by mirimir 7y ago
There are further implications.
For example, since WWII, there have been huge efforts to identify and locate war criminals. So now, where there's DNA evidence, that could continue, even though such criminals had died. And in future wars, combatants will perhaps make efforts to retain DNA evidence.
Having war be less anonymous is arguably a great thing.
- anthuman 7y agoThere have been efforts to identify and locate "war criminals" of one side. No effort has been made to identify, locate and charge war criminals of the other side ( which has far more war criminals if we are being honest ).
- mirimir 7y agoI was aiming for neutrality. But yes, you're probably right. Although I'm not sure which "other side" you mean. And still, none of that is relevant to the point about anonymity of war.