4 ms·
I just noticed that Reframe README is very amusing and wickedly hilarious in some parts. It is very refreshing to read compared to other bland/formal/techinical
by palerdot 7y ago
I just noticed that Reframe README is very amusing and wickedly hilarious in some parts. It is very refreshing to read compared to other bland/formal/techinical READMEs ... Maybe in future I will try and see if using Reframe itself is joyful like its Readme ...
- fnordsensei 7y agoOnce you get into it, it's very good. It wrinkled my brain at first though. It does include a bit more ceremony than plain Reagent, which means the app should be sufficiently advanced for the benefits to outweigh the overhead. My rule of thumb is to start with Reagent, and as soon as I notice the desire to wrap and abstract away plain atom swaps, I switch over to re-frame. Re-frame is largely an abstraction over atom swaps, and guaranteed to be better than the half-baked, 10% coverage of the Re-frame functionality that I would end up with if I did it myself. Migrating from Reagent to Re-frame doesn't have to be done in one huge refactoring. It can be done by introducing re-frame into your app function by function.