3 ms·

You're talking about malum prohibitum and I'm talking about malum in se.

• ebg13 7y ago
  I don't understand. Are you saying that it's wrong for the state to grant search warrants in the course of investigating murders? Because it seems to me that the alternative is that then all one needs to do to never be convicted of a crime is to just not consent to being investigated. So which is the lesser problem, invading privacy with a warrant or never being able to prosecute any crimes?
  • carbocation 7y ago
    Are you replying with questions that imply I said something that I never said? Edit: At the time of my reply, the prior post read (in its entirety): I don't understand. Are you saying that it's wrong for the state to grant search warrants in the course of investigating murders? I won't be replying to further posts in this thread.
    • jobigoud 7y ago
      His first question was "even with a warrant?" Which you replied to with another question. As I see it he's asking you to clarify your initial statement. No need to get all defensive.