5 ms·
Based on the burn rate as of 2018Q2 (~$720 million per quarter), they should already be bankrupt. https://ir.tesla.com/static-files/7235e525-db16-470c-8dce-9ec
by omgwtfbyobbq 7y ago
Based on the burn rate as of 2018Q2 (~$720 million per quarter), they should already be bankrupt.
https://ir.tesla.com/static-files/7235e525-db16-470c-8dce-9ecac0ad7712 https://ir.tesla.com/static-files/7235e525-db16-470c-8dce-9e...
They aren't because things change and the burn rate for 2018Q2 didn't represent 2018Q3/Q4.
- gamblor956 7y agoContext matters, as does reading comprehension. $200m/month = $600m/quarter...after 3 rounds of expense cutting. That's $200m/month in net losses during a purely operational stage. It doesn't even include the costs of a planned Model Y launch or self-driving network.
- omgwtfbyobbq 7y agoSpeaking of reading comprehension, of the $600 million/quarter you're referencing, nearly $200 million was from non-recurring items. >In Q1, we experienced non-recurring items that negatively impacted our net loss by $188 million. https://ir.tesla.com/static-files/b2218d34-fbee-4f1f-ac95-050eb29dd42f https://ir.tesla.com/static-files/b2218d34-fbee-4f1f-ac95-05... The drop in S/X deliveries from the updates to their production lines, discontinuation of the 75kWh pack, and the pull-forward from Q4 of last year due to the reduction in the US tax credit also reduced profits by ~$300-400 million. Like I said, a single data point doesn't make a trend.