4 ms·

Deliberate pseudoscience link. Mods, please remove this.

• spraak 7y ago
  It's a review of this paper [1]. Why do you consider it pseudoscience? [1] "Assessment of Hair Aluminum, Lead, and Mercury in a Sample of Autistic Egyptian Children: Environmental Risk Factors of Heavy Metals in Autism" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609793/
  • morpheuskafka 7y ago
    As is stated on their homepage[1], vaccinepapers.org takes the position that no currently marketed vaccine is acceptably safe for use because of long-debunked concerns over aluminum adjuvants causing autism. [1] http://vaccinepapers.org/about/ http://vaccinepapers.org/about/
    • spraak 7y ago
      I asked you about the paper specifically - why do you consider it pseudoscience? And long-debunked? There is really recent research about the dangers of aluminum as an adjuvant. What safety studies of aluminum as an adjuvant are you aware of? I haven't found any really.
    • yehosef 7y ago
      https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/the-fallacy-fallacy https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/the-fallacy-fallacy
  • deleted 7y ago
    [deleted]