3 ms·

Fundamentally different are at least timeframes and security. Think decades of operations and advanced persistent threats.

• sonnyblarney 7y ago
  Everyone faces advanced threats, large companies etc. The rational thing to do would be to pool talent and make sure there's a product that's well suited to them. By 'pooling' I mean paying some smart people to do that. Like Rad Hat. Or --> Micrsoft! Or whoever. Software is like anything else: it has to be made and maintained, it takes work, and someone has to pay for it. The fundamentally different issue is 'platform monopolies' which we have to watch out for. But other than that it's just a product. S. Korean gov. probably spends a zillion dollars making and maintaining roads. Do they design and build their own construction equipment? No way. Because it makes more sense for all of us if they pay some specialized people to do that, i.e. 'just buy it'. More specifically to your point, it might make sense for a 'state version' of some linux distro, that really wasn't a functional variation, but more or less a 'bundle'. Maybe RedHat could do this ...