3 ms·
Am I missing something, or are they actually unable to reliably host a static site? There are so many viable options (Netlify, Github pages, even the classic wo
by primitivesuave 7y ago
Am I missing something, or are they actually unable to reliably host a static site? There are so many viable options (Netlify, Github pages, even the classic wordpress.com). I highly doubt the claim of professional hacker - based on the grammar in their final note and the haphazard arrangement of information in the archived site, I'd speculate they had a gaping hole somewhere and never bothered to fix it.
- guitarbill 7y ago"Apache Server at kaiserpapers.org Port 443", so yeah, ~~for some reason they've decided to run their own Apache server~~ edit: this is likely incorrect, see child comment. There's nothing wrong with Apache per se, but it is a complex piece of software that requires maintenance. Of course, it's complete overkill for a static site, and asking for trouble.
- detaro 7y agoIt's shared hosting, going by the IP address, DNS server (hostgator), and the fact that there's tons of domains running on that IP.
- guitarbill 7y agoAh fair enough. I didn't want to do too much digging lest they do get someone to investigate