4 ms·
Thank you! these are very cool. > you can save some bandwidth in exchange for recording quality by using high compression of Speex algo how about using opus[0
by pacmansyyu 7y ago
Thank you! these are very cool.
> you can save some bandwidth in exchange for recording quality by using high compression of Speex algo
how about using opus[0], the comparison chart[1] shows that opus is supposedly significantly better even at a lower bitrate.
[0]: https://www.opus-codec.org/ https://www.opus-codec.org/
[1]: https://www.opus-codec.org/comparison/ https://www.opus-codec.org/comparison/
- vackosar 7y agowow, looks very good! It seems it my have even better support in players. I should try it out.
- vackosar 7y agoactually I encoded the files to 4kbps but opus goes only to 6kbps?
- zamadatix 7y agohttp://www.rowetel.com/wordpress/?page_id=452 http://www.rowetel.com/wordpress/?page_id=452 is a bit more exotic but should sound way better even though it caps out at 3.2 kbps.
- vackosar 7y agoImpressive, the Codec 2 can go down to 0.7kbps! http://www.rowetel.com/downloads/codec2/hts1a_700c.wav http://www.rowetel.com/downloads/codec2/hts1a_700c.wav
- jimktrains2 7y agoCodec2 has even lower vitrate modes than speech or opus.