Immunised testimony is only covers certain events. Seeking new testimony when complete testimony is already on file, leaves open the door to parallel construct

Immunised testimony is only covers certain events. Seeking new testimony when complete testimony is already on file, leaves open the door to parallel construction of unrelated cases. The witness may be convinced to say something that violates the terms of previous deals. If the judge truly believes her testimony might aid in convicting Assange they have no reason not to already use the extensive testimony on file. Manning has already been extensively interrogated about Assange, for a number of years. The court has those filings available to it. There is no reason to expect that new testimony with new evidence is available.