3 ms·

This is hardly a trivial solution. You're suggesting we implement large scale concentration camps, and have a police force that demands, "Papers, please!" from

This is hardly a trivial solution. You're suggesting we implement large scale concentration camps, and have a police force that demands, "Papers, please!" from whomever they judge as potentially homeless. And who is going to pay for all of this? Who is going to fund the defense against the civil rights lawsuits for this obviously unconstitutional law?

crimsonalucard 7y ago
Next level. Of course I never thought of any of this because none of it is obvious. No just kidding, it is obvious. Get this, I stand by what I'm saying despite the complications you introduced and that I am already aware of. Call it what you want. Concentration camps, Prison, Drug Rehab, mental hospitals, Gulag. It's all been done, and is being done. There's a lot of negative connotation to it but it is what is. If criminals need to go to jail to make society better so be it. If homeless people need to be forced into rehabilitation for 30 days to make society better so be it. Rights be damned. I'd give up the right to sleep, piss and shit on public streets in the blink of an eye if that meant living in a better society. Look at Singapore, you sell cocaine? Death penalty. What's going to pay for it? My taxes and the 25 million being given away to homeless people for free so they can buy more drugs (see CAAP). Seriously the amount of bearuacracy in this country is insane. If I pay 100,000 in taxes only $5 has any impact because it costs 95,000 just to get to funnel money through all the politics and corruption. A jail is the same thing as a concentration camp. Using the word concentration camp in place of jail is a political and manipulative attack. Historically, the places America labeled as Concentration camps were places where America placed innocent Japanese citizens into prison and is very different from what I am suggesting here. Being of Japanese origin I find it offensive that you would use such a racist tactic.
- deleted 7y ago
  [deleted]
- ameister14 7y ago
  >Rights be damned. That's not an American sentiment. Singapore may do things differently, but I'd prefer not to live in a broken democracy.
  - crimsonalucard 7y ago
    You can still live in a democracy with limited rights. People vote to limit their rights for the collective good. It's been done already. For example you don't have the right to murder or rob other people.

crimsonalucard 7y ago

Next level. Of course I never thought of any of this because none of it is obvious. No just kidding, it is obvious. Get this, I stand by what I'm saying despite the complications you introduced and that I am already aware of. Call it what you want. Concentration camps, Prison, Drug Rehab, mental hospitals, Gulag. It's all been done, and is being done. There's a lot of negative connotation to it but it is what is. If criminals need to go to jail to make society better so be it. If homeless people need to be forced into rehabilitation for 30 days to make society better so be it. Rights be damned. I'd give up the right to sleep, piss and shit on public streets in the blink of an eye if that meant living in a better society. Look at Singapore, you sell cocaine? Death penalty. What's going to pay for it? My taxes and the 25 million being given away to homeless people for free so they can buy more drugs (see CAAP). Seriously the amount of bearuacracy in this country is insane. If I pay 100,000 in taxes only $5 has any impact because it costs 95,000 just to get to funnel money through all the politics and corruption. A jail is the same thing as a concentration camp. Using the word concentration camp in place of jail is a political and manipulative attack. Historically, the places America labeled as Concentration camps were places where America placed innocent Japanese citizens into prison and is very different from what I am suggesting here. Being of Japanese origin I find it offensive that you would use such a racist tactic.

deleted 7y ago
[deleted]
ameister14 7y ago
>Rights be damned. That's not an American sentiment. Singapore may do things differently, but I'd prefer not to live in a broken democracy.
- crimsonalucard 7y ago
  You can still live in a democracy with limited rights. People vote to limit their rights for the collective good. It's been done already. For example you don't have the right to murder or rob other people.