> They're not a government I'm not saying they are. >it's reasonable for them to have some editorial control over what's posted to their platform I'm not say

> They're not a government I'm not saying they are. >it's reasonable for them to have some editorial control over what's posted to their platform I'm not saying it's not. I'm saying that their editorial policy is (in part) driven by fashion instead of principle. And complexity is used to obscure that rather than reveal it. My attempt to use Occam's razor to explain the obfuscation leads me to conclude there must be some utility that caused the system to evolve in such a way that it's possible to avoid seeing/acknowledging that.