5 ms·
>>When through the normal course of using a technology you reveal information to the government (in this case the military) they can use that information agains
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
>>When through the normal course of using a technology you reveal information to the government (in this case the military) they can use that information against you.
>That’s not the legal standard for searches and seizures under the 4th amendment.
Was Katz overruled?
- will_brown 7y agoNo the holding/Law is still: Regardless of the location, a conversation is protected from unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment if it is made with a "reasonable expectation of privacy". The law is not and never was: >When through the normal course of using a technology you reveal information to the government (in this case the military) they can use that information against you.