4 ms·
It seems like a very outdated part of America's immigration philosophy, but it is such a fundamental part of American culture, that I'm shocked it has recently
by schnevets 7y ago
It seems like a very outdated part of America's immigration philosophy, but it is such a fundamental part of American culture, that I'm shocked it has recently been relabeled and scorned as "chain migration".
Sure, "Talented Doctor Immigrant" migrates to the US and sponsors "Illiterate Cousin", but IC finds a less skilled role, and still has the familial support of TDI. In fact, oftentimes, this takes the form of small business loans. It's basically how every ethnic community in the US flourished, from German migrants settling the midwest to recent immigrant-fueled boons like the Indian population in Edison, NJ.
The system may be a little outdated in the globalized world, but it's a source of labor that mitigates the risk of antisocial consequences (IC turns to crime, is exploited at work, becomes a burden on the government, etc). I don't entirely agree that it's the "right" of a new immigrant, but eliminating it could have far greater consequences on the future of American than it may seem.