In this case, it seems that the jury discounted the scientific value of all the studies that were bought by Monsanto. That didn't leave them much. What was left

In this case, it seems that the jury discounted the scientific value of all the studies that were bought by Monsanto. That didn't leave them much. What was left was not incredibly compelling, but seemed to lean away from Monsanto. Some studies have leaned away from Monsanto and demonstrably been tampered to lean back towards Monsanto. So if you're trying to weed out the noise and get down to real science, things don't look good for Monsanto. They don't look terrible for Monsanto until you see how much Monsanto works to bury, obscure, or tamper with real scientific findings. At that point, you bring the hammer down.