4 ms·
I have no reason to believe that it's minimally different, and I'm curious what reason you do, aside from it's comforting. When 10 people own as much as half o
by Frondo 7y ago
I have no reason to believe that it's minimally different, and I'm curious what reason you do, aside from it's comforting.
When 10 people own as much as half of the population of the country, there's something there. Calling it not "a vast pool of money" might be semantics, because there's definitely something there.
- Kalium 7y agoWhen 10 people own as much as half the population, there's definitely a lot wrong with society. It's perhaps worth considering that most companies might not replicate that structure internally. Given the numbers above, this strikes me as good reason to suspect that the approach you describe - while definitely a good idea to promote equality! - might not have the the numerical outputs you expect.