2 ms·
Then please explain impolitely where you think I'm wrong. To clarify: “great” is no absolute, an NPP that generates electricity is obviously better than one t
by anoncake 7y ago
Then please explain impolitely where you think I'm wrong.
To clarify: “great” is no absolute, an NPP that generates electricity is obviously better than one that explodes. It also depends on the size of the explosion. A Hiroshima-class explosion would be acceptable, the one of a tsar bomb might not be. Also an NPP that fails like that would still kill its operators and perhaps some unlucky farmers. But compared to the actual worst case, that's negligible.