4 ms·
It's actually a problem at the moment. After the raise to $0.10 deposit, some people started hauling bottles over from Washington. The way the program is funded
by ppseafield 7y ago
It's actually a problem at the moment. After the raise to $0.10 deposit, some people started hauling bottles over from Washington. The way the program is funded depends on less than 100% of bottles being returned.
We need something national. And just bottles isn't going to cover it - single use plastic products are cheap enough, and companies have no incentive not to use them, so of course everyone else ends up dealing with them.
- baroffoos 7y agoAustralia has it per state and they have the refund logo printed on the bottle label. Bringing bottles from another state will result in a fine if caught.
- code_duck 7y agoIn the US machines simply won’t pay for bottles purchased out of state. That’s my experience in Michigan, anyway.
- kwhitefoot 7y agoFor the vast majority of bottles that's not a problem surely. Edit: same here in Norway, Swedish and Danish bottles are not redeemable here but it is definitely not a big enough problem to matter.
- code_duck 7y agoNot saying it’s a problem. It is that way to prevent people from buying bottles in Indiana, not paying the deposit, and driving to Michigan to get 10c a bottle.
- benj111 7y agoThe return rate is still less than 100% though? Ultimately 100% of deposits were collected, the aim should be to pay out 100% again. That's the aim, that's what success looks like. Now I have no idea how these systems are usually funded, and this probably is quite usual. But you can't complain when your system does what its supposed to. When the return rate reaches 100% then you can celebrate success and start complaining about imports.