I know but they may conceivably just charge fixed fee for enabling that option on the nodepool. > it has a high cpu or memory load, and Google would make a lot

I know but they may conceivably just charge fixed fee for enabling that option on the nodepool. > it has a high cpu or memory load, and Google would make a lot of profit on the nodes. They currently solve that problem by having their node VMs melt down at like 50% utilization so you have to run everything with huge padding.