4 ms·
I tend to agree with the obituary described about what I.M. Pei's explanation: He argued that his glass pyramid was merely an updated version of a traditi
by devy 7y ago
I tend to agree with the obituary described about what I.M. Pei's explanation:
He argued that his glass pyramid was merely an updated
version of a traditional form, and that his redesigned
courtyard had been influenced by the geometric work of the
French landscape architect Le Notre. It was rigorously
rational, in other words, and in that sense classically
French.
> but it's a little disgusting how proud of where it was placed.
Also, I.M. Pei himself considered JFK Library the most important commission of his life[1], not the Louvre Pyramid.
What he merely said was he didn't think he made a wrong choice in designing the glass pyramid. And there were quite a bit of background info and context in his choice in the wikipedia article.[2]
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I._M._Pei#/media/File:JFK_library_Stitch_Crop.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I._M._Pei#/media/File:JFK_libr...
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I._M._Pei#Le_Grand_Louvre,_Paris https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I._M._Pei#Le_Grand_Louvre,_Par...
- chengiz 7y agoThe explanation is fine by itself, however Le Notre did the Versailles gardens and they look good and are in harmony with their surroundings. The Louvre pyramid is ugly and is in disharmony, which defeats the purpose of architecture. The explanation makes it feel like an even bigger failure somehow.