4 ms·
Ok but how many engineers use React, yarn, or graphql? Facebook is still leading the way in front end development and it’s still a net positive to have that nam
by camjohnson26 7y ago
Ok but how many engineers use React, yarn, or graphql? Facebook is still leading the way in front end development and it’s still a net positive to have that name on your resume. Their brand isn’t any more tainted than Google, Microsoft, or Amazon.
- ActorNightly 7y agoOpen source libraries like React should not be attributed to companies. It just so happened that Jordan Walke worked for FB when he wrote the library. Its not like any of these companies specifically target creation of such tools as part of their business goals.
- camjohnson26 7y agoThose companies have teams that maintain them and they get tons of work done internally before they’re released. Microsoft has been great for Typescript just because of the brand that’s behind it and the teams that get paid to maintain it. React is the same way.
- sushisushisushi 7y agoI've got good news for you. You can contribute to these projects (and put your contributions on your résumé) without having the Facebook taint. e.g.: * https://github.com/facebook/react/pulls https://github.com/facebook/react/pulls
- camjohnson26 7y agoIt’s a lot easier when you’re getting paid for your time and are surrounded by other people working on the project.
- sushisushisushi 7y agoOf course it's easier. It's also easier to make money when you're working for Facebook. The question is whether or not it's worth the ethical and professional stain. Different people will make different calculations.
- jeromegv 7y agoThere's still much more chances that you will end up working on some Ad-Tech at Facebook and not cutting edge open-source development. As for the brand not being any more tainted than the other tech giants, I think the article shows the exact opposite
- just_myles 7y agoThat is a fair point. But, that's not what the topic is about. Just because they contributed to front-end development doesn't make them any less questionable. Not saying I wouldn't want to work there myself. They do some good work there i'm sure.
- apazzolini 7y agoI will happily profit from the work FB has poured into all three of those technologies and smile knowing they won't make a single cent from me.
- subparwheat 7y agoFacebook is not lacking on the problem in their web tech either. Like how terrible it's maintaining (or the lack of) flow. It's buggy as hell and I wish I didn't choose it couple years ago in my projects And for React, the head of React left FB because of the hostile working environment earlier this year. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/17/facebook-manager-quits-after-being-harassed-over-views-on-diversity.html https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/17/facebook-manager-quits-after... Facebook led the way in frontend. But for future candidate, the important question is, if they have faith that FB will continue to lead that way.
- camjohnson26 7y agoSure but no company is going to be perfect and I’d say their track record of maintaining tech is better than Google’s right now.
- quantumsequoia 7y agoThey're definitely more "tainted" than those brands. I'd say public perception of ethics in tech brands, from most to least ethical, is: Apple Microsoft Google Amazon Facebook (whether or not those perceptions are well founded is another matter)