4 ms·
> But even if I were to donate 100% of my salary, it would barely dent things for those 500 employees. There's a lot more people like you than billionares in t
by DuskStar 7y ago
> But even if I were to donate 100% of my salary, it would barely dent things for those 500 employees.
There's a lot more people like you than billionares in the world, though.
- JimBrimble35 7y ago_but the billionaire's have MOST of the money_ ............ THAT'S THE PROBLEM
- DuskStar 7y agoI'm sorry? This seems rather incoherent. Most income in the US does not in fact go to the 1%. (A greatly disproportionate amount does, of course - about 20% - as expected from an exponential distribution) And if you're talking about wealth... Well, having all the world's billionares give up their money at once wouldn't have much of a positive impact either. (The 1% in the US - not exactly billionaires, $10,000,000 puts you there - had about 35% of US wealth in 2007)
- jakelazaroff 7y agoAgreed, and people like me should donate more! But can we agree that to whatever degree the extreme upper class disproportionately controls the country's wealth, they should also disproportionately shoulder the burden of helping those beneath them?
- DuskStar 7y agoAs far as I'm aware, they already do disproportionately shoulder that burden - not just disproportionately to their proportion of the population, but also relative to their share of the country's income. What level of disproportionality is sufficient for you?