> the onus should be on you to prove that there were 6000 kid, paramedic and journalist deaths Sorry, maybe I wasn't clear. I didn't mean that all the people s

> the onus should be on you to prove that there were 6000 kid, paramedic and journalist deaths Sorry, maybe I wasn't clear. I didn't mean that all the people shot by snipers (not killed- just shot, usually in the legs and often causing permanent disabilities) were kids or paramedics or journalists. I was questioning your statement that "all ... were shown to be carrying bombs or other explosives". It's quite a categorical statement, and almost certainly wrong.