3 ms·
I think the really important question, sidestepped in the article, is how many false positives there are. It's not much good noting that RF buildups precede ear
by hugh3 16y ago
I think the really important question, sidestepped in the article, is how many false positives there are. It's not much good noting that RF buildups precede earthquakes if 99% of RF buildups aren't followed by earthquakes.
- marze 16y agoFrom the article: "It may well be that the crust generates more low frequency waves in the build up to an earthquake but there may be other mechanisms that produce a similar signal but are not linked to quakes."
- marze 16y agoFrom the article: "It may well be that the crust generates more low frequency waves in the build up to an earthquake but there may be other mechanisms that produce a similar signal but are not linked to quakes."