5 ms·
I don't follow that line of reasoning at all. "Killing in the name of religion" would be to protect or spread some sort of metaphysical belief. The equivalent w
by frankling_ 7y ago
I don't follow that line of reasoning at all. "Killing in the name of religion" would be to protect or spread some sort of metaphysical belief. The equivalent would be something like going to war with another country to build universities there.
- acct1771 7y agoCheck out this little country called Afghanistan. Although, not sure if any Universities specifically have been built there by the West, yet.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- frankling_ 7y agoJust as an exercise, it would be beneficial for you to make your argument explicit. You would notice that it falls apart/there is none.
- acct1771 7y agoWe (USA) do go and destroy places and institutions/governments and rebuild as benefits us, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_regime_change https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_r... or https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/12/23/the-cia-says-russia-hacked-the-u-s-election-here-are-6-things-to-learn-from-cold-war-attempts-to-change-regimes/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/12/2....
- acct1771 7y agoAlso, who's arguing?
- xkcd-sucks 7y agoContrasting "scientism" as faith in "science" vs "science" as an evidence based process of ascertaining how the world works, you're probably describing "killing in the name of scientism" which is effectively religion insofar as it is a matter of faith. E.g. faith that building universities and education makes people behave in a "sciencey" manner