> When the discussion comes to any other topic such as police brutality, racism, discrimination etc. these voices are conspicuously absent. Patently untrue, an

> When the discussion comes to any other topic such as police brutality, racism, discrimination etc. these voices are conspicuously absent. Patently untrue, and a baseless accusation. If anything, the recent spate in enforcing compulsory body-cams for cops, and livestreams of actual police brutality have faced ZERO calls for censorship, especially from free speech advocates. > things are illegal but let's not make any laws or have any clear legal mechanisms to effectively enforcing this What does this even mean? If something is illegal, those with standing can obviously enforce the law.