3 ms·

A couple of years ago, Cloudflare refused to remove access to ISIS websites, and said it's not the job of ISPs or themselves to police content. https://www.ibt

by dx87 7y ago

A couple of years ago, Cloudflare refused to remove access to ISIS websites, and said it's not the job of ISPs or themselves to police content. https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/anonymous-opisis-cloudflare-refuses-block-service-pro-isis-websites-1495758 https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/anonymous-opisis-cloudflare-refuse...

anigbrowl 7y ago
The policy of one internet infrastructure firm doesn't validate the original claim of ISIS' online activity being 'ignored for well over a decade.'
- DuskStar 7y ago
  It does imply they take it less seriously than stormfront, though.
  - anigbrowl 7y ago
    Do you mean Cloudfront? I suppose so, but I don't know enough about the company to reach a firm conclusion.
    - yjftsjthsd-h 7y ago
      No, stormfront was a ... racially charged... website that Cloudflare actually did refuse to host.
      - anigbrowl 7y ago
        I meant to say Cloudflare, sorry. I know what Stormfront is.