Pai, overselling something? I'm shocked. That said, this is exactly what a competent FCC should do - in the absence of a larger ruling to require consumer-prot

Pai, overselling something? I'm shocked. That said, this is exactly what a competent FCC should do - in the absence of a larger ruling to require consumer-protecting behavior to be implemented by carriers, it should seek to clarify existing rulings - which is exactly what is happening here. Carriers interpreted an older FCC statement to prohibit them from blocking robocalls by default, and it's likely this was never the intent.