I'm not so sure. An "honest cryptolocker" helps support more cryptolocker use, as people trust that if they pay the criminal they'll get their stuff If dishon

I'm not so sure. An "honest cryptolocker" helps support more cryptolocker use, as people trust that if they pay the criminal they'll get their stuff If dishonest ones were the norm, than maybe cryptolocking would cannibalize itself as nobody would pay since they know its useless. So in a sense the dishonest one while having less ethical intention has more ethical results. But only at scale. Hmmm.