4 ms·
They are a sign of urban failure. If your city needs cars your city has failed. Go spend some time a city without cars - or sections of a city that don’t allow
by jweir 7y ago
They are a sign of urban failure. If your city needs cars your city has failed. Go spend some time a city without cars - or sections of a city that don’t allow cars - I’ll wager you like it.
Unfortunately in the US many criticize such efforts as being like Disneyland - as if that is a bad a thing.
- rhapsodic 7y ago>They are a sign of urban failure. If your city needs cars your city has failed. Go spend some time a city without cars - or sections of a city that don’t allow cars - I’ll wager you like it. How would I get my drum kit to a gig in the heart of such a city?
- semafour 7y agoIn some states, suburban and rural folks find out they like concentrated areas made for people, not cars, once every year. They love the state fair.
- CompanionCuuube 7y agoDo you guarantee that the legal items one would normally transport in a car will be allowed on public transportation?
- CalRobert 7y agoI think most people agree there is _some_ use for automobiles in cities, just like there's _some_ use for helicopters in cities. It's _extremely_ limited though. I actually think it's silly to allow guns in cars and not on public transport (way more drive-bys than bus-bys, after all) but that's definitely an edge case.