4 ms·
That graph is quite misleading, it should be a percentage of total usage, if we wanted to show progress. Global energy consumption could have grown just as much
by Illniyar 7y ago
That graph is quite misleading, it should be a percentage of total usage, if we wanted to show progress. Global energy consumption could have grown just as much, making progress zero.
This graph shows things more accurately:
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-primary-energy https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-primary-energy
From 2000 energy consumption has increased by 50%. Every type of energy usage has increased except traditional biofules (wood basically).
I think the key thing to take from this graph is that renewable energies aren't replacing older methods, simply new demand is proportionally being supplied by newer method (and even that by a minuscule amount).
- Dumblydorr 7y agoGood point, bill's graph suffers from numerator analysis, only showing production but not the overall percentage based on the total. The graph you posted is sobering. Looking at coal, there is a tiny dip in it, wow that's all the death of coal we hear about. Its still going to be phased out for 20 years globally, nevermind the phaseouts of oil and natural gas which will take even longer. We have a long way to go, let's keep striving!