3 ms·
> Which explains nicely why tax "loopholes" are much better at achieving the desired result than tax "breaks." > In the former, the tax burden is reduced in ex
by vonmoltke 7y ago
> Which explains nicely why tax "loopholes" are much better at achieving the desired result than tax "breaks."
> In the former, the tax burden is reduced in exchange for specific actions by the taxpayer.
Then you would just have people misrepresent the "loopholes" as "breaks", like they did in the Amazon NYC fiasco.