4 ms·
> You're treating the article as if it's claiming proof when it's really just exploring a question. It's not "exploring a question." It's casting aspersions. W
by ErotemeObelus 7y ago
> You're treating the article as if it's claiming proof when it's really just exploring a question.
It's not "exploring a question." It's casting aspersions. Which is cowardly and intellectually dishonest.
Also the article contains nothing but lies.
- dang 7y agoCould you please review the site guidelines at https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html? Note how they include: "Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize." The author of an article is someone, and we're far away from strongest plausible territory here.