3 ms·

I understand the need to exercise freedom, and I do this when in line for TSA. I opt for hand-screening usually. But I don't see what the point is in not answe

I understand the need to exercise freedom, and I do this when in line for TSA. I opt for hand-screening usually. But I don't see what the point is in not answering where you visited. I'm pretty sure they already have this information so there's no point in hiding it, in my opinion. Plane tickets, hotel bookings, credit card usage, etc all will tell an easy tale as to where you were and what you did.

OldManAndTheCpp 7y ago
Arguably defending the right to refuse to testify.
beatgammit 7y ago
Why should you tell an officer something that you're not legally required to? It's none of their business, and if they can look it up, they can go ahead. It's a means of peaceful resistance to a procedure that's arguably unconstitutional (fourth amendment). Personally, I usually travel with family, so I don't want to make a scene. But when I travel alone, I'm a bit more resistant to trade my rights for convenience. I completely understand and respect people who peacefully resist border security, and hopefully those agents learn a thing or two about where the limits to their authority are. Please don't be a jerk about it, but you should never be compelled to give any more information or assistant than legally required.