This article contains almost a dozen character attacks on the forbes author- basically every time he is mentioned. Both authors seem to be far off from the numb

This article contains almost a dozen character attacks on the forbes author- basically every time he is mentioned. Both authors seem to be far off from the number of deaths and cancer rates estimated by the World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/chernobyl/backgrounder/en/ https://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/chernobyl/backgrounde... If you're going to claim that the entire nuclear industry is evil, and that it's technology is fundamentally dangerous, maybe it would be good to compare it to a competitor like fossil fuels. Their pollution can cause over a million deaths per year. https://www.who.int/airpollution/ambient/health-impacts/en/ https://www.who.int/airpollution/ambient/health-impacts/en/ Comparing the two by casualties per unit of power generated, this makes nuclear power appear something like 100 times safer. It's a simple calculation and if anyone's interested I could add the numbers here.