2 ms·

>As well it should be? Absolutely not! The moment you're discounting the science and dismissing stuff based on fallacious reasoning is the moment you place op

• wtallis 7y ago
  > If the Monsanto-funded studies suck, it will 100% be possible to point to the reasons why in those studies. You can't read a study to determine that it's wrong because of something like survivorship bias, because you're not reading all the conflicting results that didn't get published. The only way to determine that kind of cause is to conduct a lot of independent research seeking to replicate the questionable study. That's more likely to happen if you discount and throw out the questionable studies, leaving you with a more realistic picture of the quantity and quality of evidence you have on the issue. If you take questionable studies at face value, you're more likely to decide that you have enough evidence to come to a conclusion.