Just a nit, as petre said the 80km number you use as a radius seems high. Chernobyl was 30km, Fukushima looks to be between 30-40km on it's longest stretch. But

Just a nit, as petre said the 80km number you use as a radius seems high. Chernobyl was 30km, Fukushima looks to be between 30-40km on it's longest stretch. But even the more realistic 30km number is still more than enough to potentially hit most of southern Luxembourg where all the population is, if that's the way the wind was blowing. The implication of France having a nuclear accident that causes damage to neighboring Luxembourg is that France is at fault and owes reparation to Luxembourg. Or that France should not be allowed by international law to do something like this that puts Luxembourg at risk. If that's the case we must also accept the same thinking for the nations affected by climate change against the largest emitters of CO2. Which will put many nations, including Luxembourg which is a huge emitter of CO2 per capita (above the USA) on the hook. Things are complicated.