4 ms·
You're setting up a straw man. Google's 'favorite' site was CNN, ending up as 11% of all impressions, nearly twice as high as any other single site. Quantitativ
by rjf72 7y ago
You're setting up a straw man. Google's 'favorite' site was CNN, ending up as 11% of all impressions, nearly twice as high as any other single site. Quantitatively CNN has seen their viewership plunging to the point that they now have well under a million primetime viewers. [1] Their results on Alexa [2] show a similar online trend, and that is very much in spite of the fact that Google is constantly 'recommending' them which provides is providing a major inorganic boost to their traffic.
[1] - https://www.forbes.com/sites/markjoyella/2018/05/30/fox-news-steamrolls-cable-news-competition-with-big-win-in-may-ratings/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/markjoyella/2018/05/30/fox-news...
[2] - https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/cnn.com https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/cnn.com
- Elidrake24 7y agoIt's almost as if there is a discrepancy between an audience that uses television as their primary news source as opposed to searching for it via Google. As if they might not be the same people
- rjf72 7y agoAnd you are also straw manning. > "Their results on Alexa [2] show a similar online trend, and that is very much in spite of the fact that Google is constantly 'recommending' them which is providing a major inorganic boost to their traffic."