Who says those claims are bogus? Why would you take the Times claims at face value, but not RTs? Intelligent people don't take any claims at face value. Moll

Who says those claims are bogus? Why would you take the Times claims at face value, but not RTs? Intelligent people don't take any claims at face value. Mollow McKew is a career neocon and registered foreign lobbyist for the former Soviet country of Georgia. The NYT also cited in this article employees of New Knowledge. New Knowledge is the company that create fake bots to influence the Albamma election. The scheme involved New Knowledge creating bots that appeared to be Russian and then spreading fake stories in US corporate media that the Russians were attempting to influence the Alabama election. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/19/us/alabama-senate-roy-jones-russia.html https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/19/us/alabama-senate-roy-jon... These are the sources that the NYT uses to "debunk" claims about 5G? A conspiracy theorist who is a registered foreign lobbyist and a fraud who tried to influence an election using fake Red Scare tactics? What's even worse, at the bottom of this bit of corporate propaganda using the Red Scare to squash questions about 5G, the NYT admits: “In January, The Times announced a joint venture with Verizon to build a 5G journalism lab.”