4 ms·
> At my store, they are pushing to reduce checkout staff by "encouraging" customers to use self-checkout. It hasn't been going well, but this is a retail-wide t
by JetSpiegel 7y ago
> At my store, they are pushing to reduce checkout staff by "encouraging" customers to use self-checkout. It hasn't been going well, but this is a retail-wide trend, and cost-cutting pressures are immense.
This infuriates me so much, I started to see if I could game the system. Fruit is the easy part, you fill your bag with the expensive fruit, and select apples or something cheap on the checkout scale. Works better on larger stores, the minimum wage person overseeing 6 self-checkout machines can't watch everything, maybe half the people need help, or the scale borks for some reason.
My local supermarket replaced pre-packaged bread bags, weighted by the employees with a complete alacarte system which is complete shitshow. You pick the bread on one place, do your entire shopping and then have to remember what kind of SKU have you chosen. It's a complete waste of time for everyone, and I'm pretty sure the surrounding traditional bakeries won here, the bread selection has lowered substantially on the supermarket.
- luckman212 7y agoSo you're "infuriated" that retail stores have to cut staff in order to survive, yet in the next breath you boast about how simple it is to steal from the store? I see you also didn't forget to belittle the hapless "minimum wage person" who you're purporting to care about.
- JetSpiegel 7y ago> yet in the next breath you boast about how simple it is to steal from the store? > I see you also didn't forget to belittle the hapless "minimum wage person" who you're purporting to care about. That's my point. The employees are valuable, even in a pure profit-driven analysis. > retail stores have to cut staff in order to survive This is completely false, "surviving" is not the word to describe retailers.