4 ms·
That example was meant to be funny. That’s not to say there is not evidence of direct intervention in search rankings when the algorithm results were undesireab
by zaroth 8y ago
That example was meant to be funny. That’s not to say there is not evidence of direct intervention in search rankings when the algorithm results were undesireable.
It’s beyond question that Google manually intervenes in Search results in some cases. That could be entirely innocuous or concerningly dubious. The question is exactly how, how often, and should they be accountable for it?
- strokirk 8y agoWhy is it beyond questioning?
- bduerst 8y ago>It’s beyond question that Google manually intervenes in Search results in some cases. If it's "beyond question" then it should be easy for you to provide evidence, right? As with most conspiratorial arguments, you're trying to protect your opinion by using a false premise (and prevent people from questioning it).