2 ms·
Yeah, I was quite underwhelmed by these complaints. Several I don't even think are correct: #9: #define DEVICE_COUNT 4 uint8 *szDevNames[DEVICE_COUNT
by __david__ 16y ago
Yeah, I was quite underwhelmed by these complaints. Several I don't even think are correct:
#9:
#define DEVICE_COUNT 4
uint8 *szDevNames[DEVICE_COUNT] = {
"SelectSet 5000",
"SelectSet 7000"}; /* table has two entries of junk */
"junk" is incorrect. It has 2 entries of zeros, and that is something that you can count on. If you really don't like that (and I generally do like that) you can turn on gcc's -Wextra which will warn about it.
#17 complains about char's being signed but really it should be complaining about chars' signedness not being spec-ed (really--it's implementation dependent whether plain "char" is signed or unsigned. If you really care, use the "signed" keyword. But really, complaining about overflow? Strange.