3 ms·
Are you arguing that people aren't weaponizing victimhood to cause others to lose their job, or just that it isn't complaints to HR specifically that are causin
by lliamander 7y ago
Are you arguing that people aren't weaponizing victimhood to cause others to lose their job, or just that it isn't complaints to HR specifically that are causing people to lose their jobs?
- gumby 7y ago“Complained to HR” is a surprisingly common claim because of its handy opacity. Which could even be pierced in a legal process so I believe it was not an issue in Damore’s case, regardless of claims to that effect I’ve heard made by plenty of people not involved. Objections to damore’s essay were, AFAICT, overt and direct which is the essence of argument. As for the broader claim IMHO the “victimhood” narrative is currently a tool of the right (whether it’s the unfair press, or “Christianity under attack” and the like. But I know some people draw the opposite conclusion from the same data so I was trying not to address that.
- lliamander 7y agoOK, if we are going to focus on "Complaints to HR" (or perhaps something similar) would you consider the case of Lindsay Shepherd[1] to be a concrete example? In her case, she was reprimanded for sharing a topically relevant clip of a mainstream news show. There is a question as to whether a complaint was actually made, but the claim was made that a complaint had been filed when she was reprimanded. [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindsay_Shepherd https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindsay_Shepherd