3 ms·
The only question in front of a court is whether they broke the law. If they did something unethical but we don't have a law against it... well, fight for a new
by Faark 7y ago
The only question in front of a court is whether they broke the law. If they did something unethical but we don't have a law against it... well, fight for a new law.
If you want justice based on your morals & feelings, then you can just drop the pretense of "rule of law" / a legal system and let the mob or powerful rule as they whish. But I doubt such a system will turn out in my favor.
- wtallis 7y ago> "The jury found Roundup had been defectively designed, that the company failed to warn of the herbicide’s cancer risk and that the company acted negligently. " There's certainly reason to question the jury's determination about defective design, since that's a relatively scientific question. But that wasn't the only question before the jury. The issue of negligence with regards to the disclosing risks to the public seems to be reasonably relevant to Monsanto's misconduct; this certainly isn't a mob lynching a corporation without regard for rule of law, and on the surface it doesn't even appear to be a particularly ridiculous stretch of the law.