4 ms·
> You don't have to set a date for action to be taken... that still isn't amnesty. I clearly stated "effective amnesty" in my original post. If the day of acti
by wang_li 7y ago
> You don't have to set a date for action to be taken... that still isn't amnesty.
I clearly stated "effective amnesty" in my original post. If the day of action can be indefinitely put off, then it's effective amnesty.
>Just because a president can reverse a decision doesn't mean they always can.
What is the constitutional basis for a prior president's executive orders being irreversible by a later president?
>The case that kept DACA going was on behalf of those participating right? So it would seem something related to that was the reason for continuing the program.
What's the constitutional, or statutory, basis for non-citizens who have no lawful status in the country, to have a right to remain in the country?
- duxup 7y agoI feel like you could answer most of your questions by simply reading the decision(s) related to the DACA case. You're understanding or at least shifting statements that revolve around this being purely a case where a president has the right to change course is simply not the only factor at play. You seem more concerned about the question of immigration rather than the actual law / decisions in play.