3 ms·
From what I can see on the presentation that he links to, there's nothing to warrant the 10x more productive claim. Perhaps he's just doing a bad job of explain
by anthonyb 16y ago
From what I can see on the presentation that he links to, there's nothing to warrant the 10x more productive claim. Perhaps he's just doing a bad job of explaining the secret sauce, but I mean really? Shit like:
bind("tip", xhtml,
"done_checkbox" ->
ajaxCheckbox(userStatus.equals(Full(TipUserStatus.done)), (b: Boolean) => {
val currentUser = User.currentUser.open_!
val evertodo = TipUserBind.find(By(TipUserBind.tipid, this),
By(TipUserBind.userid, currentUser)) match {
case Full(tub) => tub.delete_!; true
case _ => false
}
makes you 10x more productive? The spreadsheet is also just for JVM frameworks, although some of them are probably MVC too, it's hard to tell.
Also, you can really tell that both the parties involved come from heavy corporate backgrounds, with massive tables of features and rating them against each other. A scale of 0, 0.5, 1.0? And then the Lift guy switches to /11? Give me a break...
- aaronblohowiak 16y agohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Up_to_eleven http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Up_to_eleven 11 is a joke.
- anthonyb 16y agoYes, I know. It still doesn't make me want to love his web framework though.