3 ms·
No, it would be monopsony; there would be lots of providers but just one payer. If someone suggested that we have "VA for all" I would think that was dumb, but
by elipsey 7y ago
No, it would be monopsony; there would be lots of providers but just one payer. If someone suggested that we have "VA for all" I would think that was dumb, but it's not what we're talking about.
What you are describing is not proposed.