> So, the fact that his opinion was once popular is irrelevant if he still held it when it became widely unpopular. It’s relevant to the decision of a company

> So, the fact that his opinion was once popular is irrelevant if he still held it when it became widely unpopular. It’s relevant to the decision of a company worried about associating itself with that opinion. The pro-life view fluctuates between being the majority and minority fairly regularly. A majority of Americans consider abortion immoral. A nonprofit that tries to provide alternatives to abortion would not be seen as a negative thing to a large portion of the population, so google has no reason to discriminate against them unless it wants to take a political view on the matter (which it would have the right to do). > Did Google really give equally to something akin to Planned Parenthood? Did planned parenthood apply for this grant and get denied? Google doesn’t discriminate against them in other contexts. E.g. here’s a news story talking about google matching employee donations to PP https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2016/12/20/google-charitable-donations-set-record/95636922/ https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2016/12/20/google-c...